
Maybe Not everyone carrying an axe is really a lumberjack
Ever seen a lumberjack in a casino? Not likely, since most lumberjacks do not generally carry their axes around with them on evenings out. But two stories have popped up in the news showing that non-lumberjacks don’t necessarily stick to these rules.
Axing For Trouble
The first of those two tales of violence took place in a village bar in Fontaniva, Italy, the place where a disgruntled gambler decided to exact their revenge on some naive slots devices after losing 5,000 euros (over $6,500) in two weeks.
The father of two, aged 48, was caught on CCTV cameras, footage of which has since stormed the media and video streaming websites, where audiences https://casinopokies777.com/royalvegas-casino/ can watch the gambler smash up seven machines as nearby customers dive for cover.
After blowing off steam, the device hacker calmly strolls out of the bar, but maybe not before giving a thumbs up towards the one-armed bandits. Either this was an indication of victory, or a show of friendship towards these machines that are particular. When coping with crazy, interpretations are anyone’s guess.
The anger-released slot axe-murderer then waited calmly for arrest outside a nearby bar.
‘ He comes in here most of the time to play the machines,’ said who owns the bar, who chose probably wisely- to remain nameless. ‘ He’s had some wins, but he spends a complete lot of cash. He could be a laborer and only works every now and then.’ evidently, this might be one worker who keeps his very own equipment handy.
‘He’s normally an extremely peaceful man. He just strolled in really calmly having an axe and smashed all the devices. There were a few customers by them during the time and additionally they had been terrified,’ he added.
The man was sentenced for six months for criminal damage and possession of an offensive weapon as a result of his strangely calm yet violent outburst. But prison overcrowding got him off with absolutely nothing more than a slap on the hand.
But Wait, There’s More…
The second of the two stories is a bit more frightening, as the axe was wielded maybe not during the slots, but at a member of the employees at a shop that is betting the Welsh capital of Cardiff.
Police reported that the ‘particularly violent’ event left the shop assistant at a Ladbrokes shop that is betting Cardiff ‘in a situation of shock.’
Before raiding the till and making off with a few cash, one of three suspects in the robbery was seen wielding an axe over his head, threatening the Ladbrokes’ employee with injury or worse if he don’t comply.
A authorities spokesperson investigating the crime stated that two men, both using ski masks, entered the bookie’s shop at 9:30 pm regarding the night of the incident. One calmly endured guard at the doorway, while the other violently threatened the associate using the tree-chopping weapon.
The frightened shop assistant then handed over what police referred to as a ‘quantity of money,’ and the men fled the scene in a getaway car driven by a suspect that is third.
Police are now appealing to the public that is local information that could assist apprehend the violent criminals, as unlike the Italian axe-wielder, they certainly did not wait calmly for arresting officers to show up in the scene.
Whose Casino Can It Be Anyway? Boston and Everett, Mass. Duke It Out
The battle continues over who gets to vote on Everett casino plan
Whilst every of the three licensing battles for casino resort projects in Massachusetts has already established its share of drama, none has proven more contentious than the fight within the casino slated to be found in the greater Boston area. Now, one Boston candidate that is mayoral threatening a lawsuit over one particular proposition that would put a casino into the neighboring town of Everett.
Voting Rights
The legal option is regarding the theory that neighboring communities could be affected by casino projects, but won’t have to be able to vote on whether those casinos must certanly be opened in the place that is first. Suffolk District Attorney Daniel F. Conley, an applicant for mayor of Boston, is one of the handful of prospects who have suggested that most of Boston should have the ability to vote on a casino that could be situated in East Boston, as an example.
It is unfair to the surrounding communities when it comes to the proposed Wynn casino project in Everett, Conley says that allowing only Everett residents to vote on. Should the East Boston proposal fail, then, he would file suit to stop the Everett casino based on the impact it would have on many Boston areas.
‘The Wynn proposal had been voted…on in just one single community,’ Conley stated within a press conference at City Hall Plaza, ‘while residents and businesses from Charlestown to Somerville and beyond will bear its traffic, economic, and burdens that are social receive none of the proposed advantages.’
Based on the state laws that produced the chance for three casinos that are new Massachusetts, only communities hosting casinos actually obtain a vote on whether or not allowing the projects to be built. However, casino designers are needed to negotiate compensation, with arbitration required if the casinos and neighborhood governments can’t come to an answer by themselves.
Conley has proposed going for a path that isn’t actually outlined in the 2011 casino law with regards to the East Boston casino proposal, one that is being manufactured by Caesars Entertainment and Suffolk Downs. He might have the whole city of Boston vote on whether to accept the proposal, while nevertheless giving East Boston veto power throughout the whole vote. The casino would have to pass votes in both East Boston alone and across the entire city in order to be approved in other words.
Yay or Nay?
A Boston Globe survey found that six of the eight mayoral candidates who answered that question were in favor of it, with just two coming out against it (with Conley and one other candidate not answering the question) while Conley has not specified whether or not he supports the East Boston casino proposal. Meanwhile, four of ten prospects supported allowing the entire town to vote on the casino, while six favored limiting the vote to simply East Boston. Another poll of Boston residents found that 44% were and only the casino, while 37% opposed it.
Even when voters back these proposals, only one will ultimately be chosen by the state once the site that is future of casino in the Boston area. Along side the Everett and East Boston casino plans, additionally there is a competing proposal from Crossroads Massachusetts to place a casino in Milford.
Labour MP Disses Sports Books, Takes Donation from Retired Bookie CEO
Chuka Umunna, taken fully to task for accepting donation
Chuka Umunna, cited as the increasing celebrity of the united kingdom’s Labour Party who has publicly announced his discontent towards the bookmaking industry got their own hand caught in the sports book cookie container after accepting a contribution of £20,000 (more than $30,000) from a retired leading activities company that is betting.
Slaps Bookies While Accepting Donation
As a wagering shop critic whom has publicly decried the number of betting shops, Umunna nonetheless accepted the large donation from chairman emeritus of the Gala Coral Group, Neil Goulden, causing users of the Conservative Party to call the shadow business secretary out, claiming Umunna is guilty of adopting double standards.
Since Gala Coral Group is one associated with largest bookies in Britain and accounts for a large number of gambling outlets, with 1,800 bookies throughout the nation- it just didn’t really read well.
Umunna has even attacked the industry directly with a campaign directed at reducing the spread of bookies and betting stores in the area roads of his London that is south Streatham, and went so far as to promise ‘new powers to get a grip on the number of betting shops.’
‘I know there clearly was huge concern that some streets in our area are steadily filling with gambling shops and payday loan organizations that take advantage of our community, rather than help us,’ wrote Umunna in a study to local voters earlier this year.
‘ Can anyone really credibly ever believe anything Chuka Umunna says?’ questioned Tory Party vice-chairman Bob Neill. ‘He says something in public and does another behind closed doors. Their hypocrisy appears to be limitless.’ And that is very uncommon for a politician.
Spared for a Technicality
However, fighting back in the corner of this Labour Party MP, a spokesperson for Umunna reported that ‘this donation was made by an individual Labour Party supporter in a capacity that is personal and was accepted in respect because of the rules and correctly declared.’
Officially, the donation from Goulden was registered as being made ‘to support the working workplace of Chuka Umunna in his capability as Shadow Secretary of State for Business, as well as for staffing,’ so it does officially pass as legitimate.
Even though Goulden is no further head of the Gala Coral Group of operations, the ten years he spent as managing director, chief executive and chairman of the group means he still provides consultancy services and chairs the Responsible Gaming Trust.
Whether it is a entirely innocent contribution or not, and whether or otherwise not the Conservative Party that are looking to ruin the promotion of a rival MP by claiming hypocrisy, Umunna was still a bit red-faced when the news broke, especially after taking such a difficult stance against the spread of the industry in their regional constituency.
‘ The thing that is only know he truly believes is that the capital is filled with ‘trash’ and ‘C-list’ wannabes,’ claimed Bob Neill.
Umunna, that is considered to be a future Labour Party leader, has experienced his fair share of embarrassment as earlier this year their office was accused of modifying his Wikipedia page to show evaluations between himself and Barack Obama.